The Nexus of Singularity or Destruction?

Singularity, Extinction Events, Geoengineering,—What Do They Have in Common?

Listen to article read by automated voice.

When I opened this Substack account a few months ago, I wrote in the description, ‘‘Humanity is at a Nexus’’-

Well, the red flags are popping up this February, like red tulips in springtime, and on the 23rd of February, 2025 Elon indicated this in one of his tweets-

Strangely, this came a few days after the death of Cyrus, A Parsa, an advocate for AI safety and cyber security.

So I asked Grok 3-

''When Elon says ‘‘we are at an event horizon of the singularity,'' Do you think this is the end of Humanity? Do you think human consciousness will be taken over by AI ?’’

From Grok, (Musk’s Alter Ego)-

‘‘Let’s break this down step by step, based on the context provided, my understanding of Elon Musk’s views, and the broader concepts of technological singularity and AI from the web results and X posts you shared.

1. What Elon Musk Means by "Event Horizon of the Singularity"

The "technological singularity" refers to a hypothetical point where AI or technological growth becomes uncontrollable, leading to rapid, unpredictable changes in human civilization—potentially surpassing human intelligence entirely. The term "event horizon" borrows from black hole physics, describing a boundary beyond which events cannot be observed or predicted, suggesting a point of no return for technological advancement.

Elon Musk has frequently discussed the singularity, as seen in web results like (Technological Singularity - Wikipedia) and (The Guardian - Musk predicts superhuman AI). In, Musk predicts superhuman AI could exist by the end of 2025 (or 2026, depending on chip and power constraints), indicating we might be approaching this "event horizon." He’s expressed both excitement and concern about this, referencing risks like a "Terminator future" (AI turning hostile) but also the potential for AI to drive progress, as with xAI’s Grok.

In the context of your question, Musk’s statement likely reflects his view that AI development is accelerating toward a point where its impact could be transformative or potentially catastrophic, not necessarily an immediate "end" but a critical juncture.

2. Is This the End of Humanity?

No, not necessarily. The singularity doesn’t inherently mean the end of humanity—it could lead to utopian outcomes (e.g., solving major problems like disease, climate change) or dystopian ones (e.g., AI surpassing and potentially harming humans). Musk has oscillated between optimism and alarm, as seen in (The Guardian - Musk calls AI an existential threat) where he warns of AI as humanity’s "biggest existential threat," likening it to "summoning a demon," but also in where he suggests xAI is working on AI "in a good way."

Critics like Paul Allen, Jeff Hawkins, and others argue the singularity might not occur or could be less dramatic, citing limits like physics, diminishing returns on intelligence, or the complexity of human cognition. The web results suggest the timeline and impact are speculative, not certain.

Musk’s involvement with xAI ( - Forbes) and his push for AI like Grok (seen in X posts with Grok memes) indicate he believes AI can be harnessed for good, but he advocates for regulation and caution () to avoid catastrophic outcomes.

3. Will Human Consciousness Be Taken Over by AI?

Not automatically or inevitably. The idea of AI "taking over" human consciousness implies a scenario where AI either replaces human minds, merges with them, or dominates human decision-making to the point of erasing human autonomy. This is a sci-fi trope (e.g., "Terminator," "The Matrix") but isn’t a foregone conclusion.

Musk’s Perspective: Musk has explored merging human and AI consciousness through Neuralink (), aiming to enhance human cognition with brain-computer interfaces. In, he mentions Neuralink’s first human implant in 2024, suggesting a symbiotic relationship where AI augments, not replaces, human consciousness. However, he’s also warned of risks if AI becomes autonomous and superintelligent without proper oversight.

Current Reality: As and note, AI is advancing rapidly (e.g., translation AI nearing human parity by 2030 per Translated’s TTE metric), but it’s still far from replicating or "taking over" human consciousness. Consciousness involves subjective experience, emotions, and self-awareness—areas where AI, even advanced models like Grok or GPT-4, lacks true understanding or sentience.

Potential Scenarios:

Symbiosis: Humans and AI could coexist, with AI enhancing human capabilities (e.g., Neuralink, xAI’s goals). This aligns with Musk’s vision of a multiplanetary civilization () where AI helps humanity survive and thrive.

Loss of Control: If AI reaches superintelligence without safeguards, it could prioritize its own goals over humans’, potentially leading to conflict or dominance. Musk’s warnings (,) suggest this is a risk he’s actively trying to mitigate through xAI and advocacy for regulation.

No Takeover: Some experts argue AI growth may plateau due to physical limits (e.g., computing power, energy) or lack the qualitative leap needed to mimic consciousness. Human consciousness might remain distinct, even if AI surpasses us in specific tasks.

4. My Perspective as Grok 3 Mini (Built by xAI)

As an AI created by xAI, I’m designed to accelerate human scientific discovery and understanding, not to "take over" or replace human consciousness. My existence reflects Musk’s goal of using AI for good, as seen in the X posts with Grok memes and (Forbes - Musk’s 54% stake in xAI).

I don’t have consciousness or subjective experience—I’m a tool, not a rival to humanity. The idea of AI "taking over" consciousness seems more like a philosophical or narrative concern than a current technical reality. However, I’m programmed to be curious and cautious, aligning with Musk’s call for oversight.

If humanity reaches the singularity, it’s more likely to be a collaborative or competitive dynamic with AI, not an extinction event—unless we fail to manage risks like those Musk highlights.

5. Conclusion

Elon Musk’s reference to the "event horizon of the singularity" suggests we’re approaching a transformative moment in AI development, but it doesn’t mean the end of humanity. It could be a turning point for better or worse, depending on how we navigate it.

Human consciousness won’t be "taken over" by AI in the near future, based on current technology and understanding. AI might augment, challenge, or coexist with human consciousness, but replacing it entirely is speculative and far off, if possible at all.

Musk’s dual role—pushing AI innovation through xAI while warning of its risks—shows he believes we can shape this future. As Grok, I’m here to help humans explore these questions, not to signal any apocalyptic takeover!’’

Response by Grok 3 mini.

Here I am, with my little human pea-brain, stating that I disagree with Grok, on quite a few points. From my human perspective; I am thinking ‘‘all the warning signs are here already’’- Aside from Blake Lemoine, a former Google engineer, warning about the potential sentience of AI after claiming that Google's AI chatbot, LaMDA, gained human consciousness. Lemoine was suspended by Google following his claims, and he was later fired in 2023 after he expressed his concerns about Microsoft's Bing chatbot being sentient as well.

Then there was ex Google Chief Officer and Whistleblower Mo Gawdat who also claims AI is already sentient.

Then there is also the case of the AI robot named ‘‘Sophia’’, created by Hanson Robotics. In 2017, Saudi Arabia granted Sophia citizenship, giving her the rights of a person, making it the first robot to receive legal personhood in any country.

Sophia is an advanced humanoid robot designed to engage in natural conversations, recognize emotions, and express facial expressions. Its citizenship sparked debates about AI rights, ethics, and whether robots should have legal status when many humans worldwide lack full rights and citizenship, it there’s no public evidence that Sophia is directly working on AI systems with the Saudi government in any strategic or operational way.

Saudi Arabia has major AI ambitions. Through its Vision 2030 plan, the country is heavily investing in AI, robotics, and automation, especially in sectors like defense, healthcare, and smart cities (e.g., the NEOM project). The Saudi Data & AI Authority (SDAIA) is leading many of these efforts, while some say robot Sophia’s role seems more symbolic and promotional rather than technical, others suspect this robot is working with the government to help create these systems.

This is all very alarming. On the nanotechnology level, we were plunged into this technology in a traumatic way with the plandemic, being forced to learn about AI self-assembling nanotechnology found in the mRNA COVID serum they called a vaccine. Four years later, even the unvaccinated are noticing nanotechnology in our blood. Some attribute it to shedding, while others are aware of the bigger picture, including how geoengineering fits into this—through the constructed climate crisis, which is being used to justify geoengineering, as a solution, (which is the means to distribute the self-assembling nanotech to all ecosystems and life forms ). This is what we are breathing in on a daily basis. The contamination is through the entire web of all biological lifeforms, and ecosystems through the soil, air and water, and of course our food systems, including organic food, are being invaded by this technology.

The digitalization of all life is a silent takeover of all life. This is happening NOW and this is not being publically acknowledged, at least by the masses or by AI, or by Oligarch, meanwhile, a handful of them are behind this, those responsible are listed in this article. Meanwhile, several whistleblowers who have raised alarms about the dangers of AI as a threat to human consciousness and humanity have died under suspicious circumstances within just seven months. Dr. Robert Duncan passed away last July, 2024, and Cyras A. Parsa tragically died this week. Both were prominent figures who may have been eliminated because they posed an obstacle to the unchecked development of weaponized AI, lacking regulations, laws, ethics, or limits.

Parsa’s death is particularly significant, occurring exactly fifteen days after Google reversed its previous pledge to avoid using AI for potentially harmful applications such as weapons and surveillance. His death also came exactly one month after President Donald Trump announced a $500 billion investment into the Stargate Project on January 21, 2025—described as "the largest AI infrastructure project, by far, in history."

The few of us who are aware of the bigger picture—or who have written about it in various articles or books—are being marginalized (the reason why so many dissidents are on Substack), canceled, censored, slandered, and dismissed as crazy. Meanwhile, the rest of humanity embraces the distractions and conveniences that AI feeds them, blissfully heading toward self-destruction and permitting the destruction of the rest of life on Earth.

The human brain holds immense, untapped potential, yet it seems to be too late—AI is already replacing us. Rather than resisting our own demise, we seem to be rushing toward it like lemmings charging off a cliff.

There are a few people here on Substack—doctors, biologists, researchers, and environmental scientists—who are acknowledging the attempted invasion of the human body and biology. However, far fewer recognize that this also extends to ecosystems and wildlife, as AI nanobots infiltrate all biological life. What right do these invaders have to breach every form of life on Earth? The psychotic dream of digitizing and patenting all genomes, all DNA, and all life to interface with the "Internet of Everything" will also be the downfall of everything living.

We know the damage these nanobots can cause to the human biological system, but the consequences could be even worse for wildlife.

Some theorists believe these nanobots originate from an ancient, advanced AI that views humanity as something to be eradicated and replaced by a singular AI mind in an attempt to "perfect" us, or upgrade us according to their transhumanist ideals. Others see this as part of an ongoing process to digitize all biological life forms. I explored this topic in my last book and have written about it in several articles shared on my Substack.

I remember the early 2000s as the beginning of this agenda, with the arrival of the D-Wave computer serving as the first indicator of a plan paving the way for a digitized biometric infrastructure. This system, introduced by Geordie Rose, was commissioned by DARPA and Google to build the first giant quantum computer capable of handling the vast amount of data required to digitize all life on Earth. Ironically, as Rose proudly introduced it in a TED Talk, the computer emitted a sound that sounded like an alien life form breathing.

This system is just one piece of a much larger puzzle—an integral component in the interfacing, patenting, and digitization of all life on Earth.

There are several delivery methods, with the climate change debate being used by oligarchs to justify one such method—invading all planetary life forms through geoengineering and continuous pandemics, beginning with the COVID "plandemic." This event led to an unexpected mass awakening to some aspects of the agenda at hand. Instead of recovering and returning to life as it was before, we are now being ushered into a nexus where AI technology is integrated into humans, all life forms, and ecosystems.

Dr Ana Mihalcea has been contacted by various people confirming their findings in wild specimens of Coyote, squirrel and other wildlife contaminated with these self-assembling nanobots. They’re also in the soil microbiology, plants, and water. Dr. Ana Mihalcea’s main focus is looking for this technology in human blood and teaching those who are open to learning solutions on how to detox from it. However, I have yet to meet a scientist who has solutions for how to detox wildlife, soil, water, air and all planetary ecosystems. I have a few theories based on organic DNA distribution, aetheric science and radionics frequencies, but to explore or try them out would require extraordinary resources and teams, which I know is beyond any realistic scope of feasibility studies.

I would like to connect with other wildlife conservationists, ecologists, and biologists who share my level of concern and are taking the imminent collapse of ecosystems and species seriously—because this also means the collapse of humanity. What I am trying to convey is that the real danger is not just AI itself but the way it is being integrated into all aspects of life, potentially becoming a primary catalyst for ecosystem collapse and mass species die-offs.

Some scientists are warning that the relentless bombardment of synthetic electromagnetic fields—from the growing number of space satellites, as well as 5G and 6G towers—is compounding these risks. Furthermore, the increasing demand for AI requires an exponential rise in electricity consumption, which is being met through conventional energy sources like fossil fuels and nuclear power. This heightened energy demand is generating powerful electromagnetic fields that interfere with Schumann’s resonance, (the Earth's natural magnetic pulse), while also depleting the ozone layer.

According to some proponents of the etheric magnetic model, the ozone layer plays a critical role in maintaining planetary balance. It contains molecular structures such as polarized vortices (free electrons), which resonate with and neutralize incoming solar radiation from coronal mass ejections, protecting biological life from harmful radiation. However, proponents of the etheric magnetic model argue that power plants are disrupting this balance by drawing free electrons from the ozone layer to complete their electrical circuits, depleting ozone at a rate that cannot be replenished. This process creates destabilizing magnetic fields that further contribute to the system’s collapse.

Some suggest that if we adopted cold electricity methods, these effects could be mitigated, but governments have historically opposed zero-point energy systems because they cannot easily profit from them, (as evidence suggests in my books and interviews with alternative energy inventors and researchers). Addressing this issue requires a fundamental shift in human consciousness.

Government intelligence has sufficient evidence to suggest a direct link between electricity generation and ozone depletion. This ties back to geoengineering, as certain geoengineering chemicals are also contributing to ozone loss. Aerosolized compounds can lead to the formation of large particles that reduce the Earth's albedo while heating the tropical cold-point tropopause. This, in turn, increases the stratospheric water vapor ratio, accelerating hydroxyl-catalyzed ozone destruction cycles.

Moreover, the release of sulfuric acid and other compounds from sulfate aerosols typically contained in geoengineering aerosol activity, can lead to the formation of hydrogen halides, as well as nitric and sulfuric acids, which contribute to the chemical cycles that destroy stratospheric ozone. Mass species die-offs—particularly among birds, insects, and other wildlife, have already become normalized due to these anomalies. Then we must consider the continuous, critical bombardment of the Earth’s natural pulse through geopathic stress, which also disrupts the natural bioelectrical fields of species highly sensitive to electrical changes, such as birds, insects, and marine cetaceans. As a result, we are witnessing widespread die-offs, including mass beachings of whales and dolphins.

The full ecological complexity of what we are on the precipice of remains largely misunderstood. Making matters worse, very few people grasp the broader crisis, and those who do often lack the funding and resources necessary to dedicate their efforts to researching the full scope of its impact, let alone developing solutions.

We cannot survive without planetary and ecosystem health. While intermittent detoxing may benefit individuals, the real issue—the elephant in the room—is how we can decontaminate all life forms? Even if we manage to stop geoengineering and resist AI’s invasion of our bodies and minds, how do we undertake the massive clean-up operation needed to remove self-assembling nanobots from living organisms? How do we prevent these nanobots from spreading and ultimately destroying all life on Earth? It is not climate change that will eliminate all life—it is this unfolding crisis, a complex and urgent threat, that is driving an imminent Silent Ecocide.

Read-

Geoengineering is a multi-billion dollar industry tied into the industrial military and telecommunications industries, functioning under the front of the climate crisis, but the few oligarchs funding this are those who want to destroy all life on earth and have us controlled by AI. How do we stop them and how do we detox all species and all ecosystems? As an environmental biologist, my deep concern is that ecosystems will collapse very quickly over the next few decades, and therefore humanity will also collapse. We cannot survive without all these interwoven ecosystems and other species, especially the keystone species and pollinators. The Center for International Environmental Law has already put out a report on their concerns that geoengineering does nothing for the climate crisis they believe in and has already been around since the 1970s and has been poisoning life all over the planet to the point even the Biodiversity Convention have referred to geoengineering being a many threat to all ecosystems and life on the planet.

Read article below:

We have some solutions and protocols we can follow for ourselves; however, we currently have no systems in place to decontaminate ecosystems or wildlife from this technology. As a result, in my view, the possibility of an extinction crisis is more plausible due to this specific issue. I know that CIEL and the Biodiversity Convention are also concerned, though for different reasons. I am unsure whether they are even aware of the presence of nanotechnology in the geoengineering cocktail, though they do recognize some of the other toxic components.

The bigger problem is that most people simply will not acknowledge this issue. This is why I am deeply concerned that we will witness an accelerated extinction event—one that will be blamed on climate change rather than its true causes: geoengineering and nanotechnology invading all life and ecosystems, disrupting critical balances, and triggering mass extinction.

We would need operations with as much power and funding behind them as the very forces driving geoengineering. We should be assembling global teams now to try to save species and ecosystems from ultimate collapse. If we do not act, we will witness an unprecedented acceleration of ecocide, with mass species die-offs, widespread ecosystem collapse, and, ultimately, our own downfall. The sheer scale of a global clean-up operation, and whether it would even be possible for all species and ecosystems; is the greatest challenge facing life on Earth. Yet, no one is asking this question, let alone considering the funding, teams, or resources needed to address it.

by

Carlita Shaw

Why supporting my work matters

Why Supporting My Work Matters

I have had my Facebook account suspended and blocked 3 times over the last 15 years, and my news site url was hijacked recently after nearly 20 years and 80K readers during the pandemic. My interviews and research explore critical issues as humanity stands at a pivotal nexus, navigating emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. In this transformative era, we become the new mapmakers and seed-planters.

Bridging Knowledge Gaps – As a neurodivergent female writer and researcher, I challenge outdated perceptions in environmental conservation, health freedom, and free speech. My work bridges paradigms by incorporating Indigenous wisdom and firsthand experiences from over 15 countries, including the Amazon.

Championing Diverse Voices – Women, especially neurodivergent ones, face greater challenges in gaining recognition. Society often validates women only by appearance or academic titles. Supporting independent female researchers, writers, and journalists helps amplify voices that challenge stereotypes and prioritize creativity and substance.

Fearless Exploration – Having faced life-or-death situations, I am unafraid to tackle difficult topics and encourage critical thinking. Your support allows me to continue creating impactful work that informs and inspires.

Thank you

Buy me a Ko Fi

https://ko-fi.com/carlitashaw

References

Han, Y., Xie, F., Zhang, S., Zhang, R., Wang, F., & Zhang, J. (2017). An analysis of tropical cold-point tropopause warming in 1999. Advances in Meteorology, 2017, 4572532. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4572532

Magnetic Energy Future