Understanding Nanotechnology Exposure & Environmental Contamination
– Implications for All Life
The discussion around how unvaccinated individuals might be contaminated with substances like spike proteins or nanobots from those who are vaccinated often centers on direct physical contact. However, an emerging concern is the exposure through geoengineering practices. This means that the concept of being “unaffected” by not being vaccinated might be an oversimplification.
Geoengineering and Nanotechnology
Geoengineering, the deliberate large-scale intervention in the earth’s climate system, has been in action for some decades and is used as a method to counteract climate change, although recently, (CIEL), Center of International Environmental Law have proven with their report on geoengineering that it does nothing to mitigate climate change and instead is poisoning all life on the planet and impacting human health detrimentally. However, alongside these efforts, there’s a growing discourse about the unintended or intended dispersion of nanotechnology, including graphene oxide, into the environment. This could potentially affect all life forms, including humans, regardless of vaccination status.
Evidence from Research
Dr. Ana Mihalcea has conducted research suggesting that both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals can have similar types of nanotechnology in their systems, like “blinkers,” self assembling nanobots, and hydrogel. Her findings, based on blood analysis, challenge the idea that only those who’ve had direct contact with vaccinated individuals are the only ones at risk. This research can be explored further on her Substack at substack.com/@anamihalceamdphd. where there are videos of her findings for all to see.
She recently published an article where she states ”bio -surveilling people for the purpose of ultimate control. This control happens from the inside, without the humans knowing. Simply by affecting the electrical discharges in our neurons people can be altered. In bio-surveillance technologies, the decoding of the human character, emotions and thought process is extremely far advanced. China’s thought police is an example of this. The World Economic Forum has already presented technologies that can read brain waves and can perform surveillance on workers EEG patterns.‘‘ Dr. Ana Mihalcea Neurohacking and Artificial Intelligence
She further elaborates- ”This is why my substacks are such a mix of medicine, science and technology, spirituality, the study of consciousness and what it means to be a human being – because all of these areas are interconnected in solving the growing threat of technocratic transhumanism. My focus is that evidence of the self assembly nanotechnology and the explanation of how far advanced AI already is, will allow the remaining free humans that have not yet been assimilated into the cybernetic hive mind to create a necessary course change – meaning the immediate moratorium on AI controlled self assembly nanotechnology and AI development.
Cyrus Parsa from the AI organization mentions AI extinction codes that his organization found in the Bio Digital Network present in humans – that can be activated by AI at will. He explains that via the process of facial recognition, biometrics, voice recognition, and other surveillance technologies AI signature codes can be found in those humans who are controlled via AI in their neural networks. This is not science fiction, but happening right now.” – Dr. Ana Mihalcea Neurohacking and Artificial Intelligence
Impact on All Life Forms
This issue extends beyond humans; Not many aside from Dane Wigington have observed the impacts on ecosystems and wildlife such as squirrels, coyotes, and wolves are reportedly showing signs of nanotech contamination with findings of the same self assembling nanotechnology present in their blood samples. Both sources from Dr Ana Maria Mihalcea, Dane Wigington and others are seeing evidence of contamination in wildlife, these nanobots are also in the soil, plants, water, air, and all ecosystems. This widespread presence of nanotechnology in the environment suggests a more complex exposure scenario than previously considered, although geoengineering has been an active global project that can be traced back to 50 years ago, this is newly emerging evidence that builds a more deeply disturbing dystopian picture of the psychopathic oligarchs agenda to digitalize all life. Those involved in these operations include the largest corporations and military complex companies such as Blackrock and Lockheed Martin in collaboration with Bill Gates and others involved in funding the geoengineering experiments, which have always been able to to bypass all official environmental risk assessment reports and investigations, despite there being over 500 operations being carried out over the entire globe and without most countries consent, let alone the awareness of the people. Every other type of environmental experiment requires an environmental impact risk assessment, the fact that these bypass this already shows the level of dark motives behind geoengineering.
Mitigation and Detoxification
In response to these findings, Dr. Mihalcea suggests using EDTA calcium disodium and ascorbic acid to potentially counteract or inhibit the assembly of nanobots, after her findings showed there was a patent for this inhibition owned by one of the Covid vaccine manufacturers. Similarly, Dr. David Nixon has investigated the use of colloidal gold as a means to mitigate the effects of this technology, he has demonstrated with filming the process in a petri dish, the alchemic effects of how colloidal gold doesn’t even need to be in the same petri dish to cause an immediate effect on the nanoparticles, it can be in the near vicinity, possibly in connection with the frequency it is emitting rather than chemistry. These approaches indicate that regular detoxification could be necessary for both the vaccinated and unvaccinated to manage or reduce exposure to these substances. The bigger question then is how do we detox the environment and wildlife?
Broader Implications
The implications of this technology, are profound. They touch on issues of invasion of bodily autonomy, accessing human biodata without individual consent, which is a huge violation of human rights, sovereignty and privacy, mental autonomy, and the potential for external control of the human mind and body using EMF frequencies to influence an individual’s biological and mental processes and behaviour. With advancements like communications, computing, nano-sized sensors, electronics, smart dust, and the emergence of potentially “Beyond Human AI”, the narrative that we could all be turning into “cyborgs” via environmental exposure to nanotechnology, and graphene oxide enabling control through technologies like 5G, coupled with geoengineering, as they’ve been spraying a conducting plasma field for these frequencies under the philanthropic guise of dimming the Sun for climate change.
This is all very alarming and of course there are challenges for obtaining further information on this as the need for rigorous scientific validation, the fact is the science papers are out there already and have been piling up for decades, the problem is the military industrial complex which keeps its operations hidden, sometimes in plain site, funnelled through various different overlapping projects, that are kept ‘secret’ yet its possible to come across various reports and pdfs that have all of this information out in the open, for example on NASA’s website this document was found Future Warfare 2025, a military report written in 2011, by Dennis M. Bushnell, who was Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center.
The document explores the profound changes anticipated in human evolution, warfare, and strategic planning due to ongoing technological revolutions in IT, Bio, and Nano fields. It suggests that by 2025, warfare will pivot from being about who the adversary is to focusing on what capabilities they have, fueled by rapid technological progress. This shift occurs amidst global economic trends where the U.S. has lost its lead in research, with significant research activities now taking place abroad and predominantly in the commercial sector rather than being government-funded.
Key technological developments include an exponential expansion in IT, ushering in concepts like the “Internet of Everything,” which could dismantle class divisions and foster wealth creation through innovation. Biotechnology and nanotechnology are poised to transform sectors like agriculture, energy, and materials science, introducing innovations such as “pharm animals” for pharmaceuticals, seawater biomass for sustainable energy, and biosteel from genetically engineered organisms. In military applications, these advancements herald an age of precision and volumetric weaponry, encompassing EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses) that can cripple electronic systems, information warfare, and sophisticated biological threats like binary bio-weapons, which pose risks to food security, ecosystems, wildlife, and have a profound impact human health and human thought, emotions and behaviour.
This emerging information requires a skeptical approach and extensive scientific verification, ideally complemented by personal research where possible. Although the narrative around these technologies’ impact on all life forms is gaining attention, it’s crucial to advocate for independent, peer-reviewed studies to either validate or debunk these claims. However, the controversial nature of the topic combined with the need for cooperation and transparency from government bodies and researchers within the military-industrial complex presents significant obstacles to achieving this.
The integration of technology into biological systems on this scale heralds a profound shift in how humans interact with the environment, demanding a wide-ranging and in-depth scientific investigation. We are venturing into uncharted territory, with little understanding of the consequences for nature, animals, and ecosystems. The stigma surrounding these subjects creates a reluctance among biologists and environmental scientists to engage in open discussion, yet these technologies are already impacting all forms of life, destroying marine and terrestrial ecosystems. This fear of discussing or researching these issues openly is exacerbated by the covert nature of much of this development, making it challenging to gather a comprehensive understanding without access to sophisticated laboratory resources.
Despite this, there exists a substantial body of peer-reviewed literature on nanotechnology, providing ample evidence of these advancements. However, public discourse, particularly within environmental, ecological, biological, or scientific communities, remains sparse. The only notable source approaching this topic is CIEL’s document on the impact of geoengineering on biodiversity, ecosystems, and human health, although it falls short in providing a detailed analysis of the specific chemical compounds or nanoparticles used in these activities. This scarcity of public information stems from the clandestine operations of government and military entities, often in partnership with private companies that produce these materials. Consequently, much of this information is shielded from the public eye, with even certain governmental sectors lacking access to these details.
Conclusion
This topic underscores the rapid evolution of information and technology, highlighting the urgent need for the public to stay informed and to foster transparent discussions free from stigma. To achieve this, we must utilize uncensored information platforms, facilitate networking, and share the latest research through conferences that involve both experts and investigative journalists.
The public must be educated about the profound implications these technologies could have on personal autonomy, human and planetary health, and the natural world. There’s a disturbing narrative that suggests an elite group is embarked on a mission to manipulate all life forms, aiming for a digital transformation that could lead to total control. It’s essential for the public to be informed, vocal, and proactive in countering these agendas. A starting point for action could be joining organizations like CIEL, in their mission to put a stop to global geoengineering.
Simultaneously, the public should approach nanotechnologies in military and medical applications with greater skepticism. There’s a pressing need for a movement to uncover any secretive practices that could be altering our biological environment for the “Internet of Everything” with 5G and 6G technologies, combined with geoengineering. This affects not just our natural biological systems but also our ecosystems.
Now is the moment for a collective call to action. Researchers, journalists, scientists, and policymakers must collaborate to scrutinize, debate, and possibly regulate the application of nanotechnology in geoengineering, medicine, wildlife, agriculture, and water systems. This must be done with transparency, consent, and with the public’s interest at heart. Continuing these practices without public knowledge is not only a crime against humanity but also constitutes heavy environmental impacts and therefore grave violations.
by
Sources
Future Warfare 2025 written in 2011 by Dennis M Bushnell
Ciel report on exposing Geoengineering
Self Assembling Nano tech articles emerged in 2010
Injectable wireless microdevices
Why Supporting My Work Matters—Carlita's interviews and news explore information that reflects the issues we contend with as humanity stands at a pivotal nexus point. We are venturing into uncharted territory with emerging technologies that bring new challenges and evolving paradigms that push against old beliefs and agendas. In this transformative era, we become the new mapmakers and seed-planters.
1. Bridging Knowledge Gaps-As a neurodivergent female researcher and writer, I bring a unique perspective to challenging mainstream narratives and outdated perceptions. My work in environmental conservation, health freedom, free speech, and learning from the ancients, aiming to fill the gaps in understanding, serving to bridge paradigms and navigate the complexities of a rapidly changing world, I have traveled to the far reaches of the Amazon rainforest with my work to learn from Indigenous voices and lived and travelled in over 15 countries in the last 18 years.
2. Championing Diverse Voices- Firstly, I have always had a unique perspective because of my Aspergers, ADHD, and dyslexia. I persevere despite these neurodivergent challenges. Moreover, being a woman means I have to work much harder to gain any recognition in what I do, I often feel invisible and that my work isn't gaining the momentum it deserves. Women often face additional hurdles in gaining recognition for their work. By supporting my efforts, you’re helping amplify a voice that challenges stereotypes and archetypes, valuing creativity, innovation, and substance over superficial expectations. A woman’s voice is often seen through a clouded lens of societal judgment and archetypes, where others feel compelled to place her in a predefined box—she is typically only validated by her attractiveness or for her academic achievements if she carries titles before or after her name. Otherwise, she has to work much harder to have her voice or work noticed compared to her male peers, as we still live in a patriarchal world, that's why it's valuable for us all to support the work of independent female researchers, writers, journalists, artists, filmmakers, digital media producers.
3. Fearless Exploration- There have been times in the past where I have found myself in some very challenging life-or-death scenarios. That’s why I feel I have nothing to lose anymore and I am wholeheartedly committed to tackling topics that others may shy away from, because they might challenge the mainstream narratives, encouraging critical thinking and fostering meaningful dialogue. Your support enables me to continue my commitment to creating impactful work that inspires and informs.
Thank you
Buy me a Ko Fi