Decoding Climate Change: Is the Narrative Driven by Science or Power?
31st December 2024
Listen to article here:
A Political and Economic Scheme to Drive a Socialistic Climate Credit System?
The narrative of global warming, now commonly referred to as climate change, has become central to global policy, economics, and public discourse. However, there's a contentious debate suggesting that this narrative might be less about environmental stewardship and more about political and economic manipulation. Critics argue that climate change policies are being used to centralize control and create economic opportunities for a select few, potentially paving the way for a socialistic climate credit scheme.
Understanding Climate Change: Beyond the Mainstream Narrative
Climate change as a natural phenomenon is acknowledged by scientists, but the narrative that it's primarily driven by human activity and will inevitably lead to catastrophic outcomes has long sparked heated debate. The idea that CO2, a naturally occurring gas integral to ecological processes, is the chief culprit behind rising temperatures oversimplifies the issue. This perspective ignores a wealth of other significant factors influencing temperatures and weather changes, that should be considered in scientific discourse, including solar mass ejections (a primary influencer), volcanic eruptions, changes in atmospheric gases, UV radiation levels, and geological data from sources like Vostok ice cores and ocean sediment cores, which provide insights spanning millions of years.
Historical data from various sources, including ice cores and sediment records, reveal that the Earth has experienced significantly higher temperatures long before human influence or the industrial era. During these periods, CO2 levels were often lower than current ratios, contradicting the political narrative that CO2 is the primary driver of temperature increases. Many climate and environmental scientists are aware of this significant discrepancy, yet they remain silent, primarily to secure their livelihoods through research funding and job stability. Speaking out could lead to professional ostracism, job loss, and public vilification, a pattern observed well before 2020 within the environmental science field. This situation mirrors the experiences of doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic who faced similar repercussions for challenging prevailing narratives.
Real objective environmental scientists are hard to find, as if you are funded for being a pro-climate crisis scientist, you get funding easily, otherwise you get no funding at all. Objective scientists or environmental researchers and campaigners that have no stake holds or corporate sponsors or energy sponsors take into account unbiased data from our biggest influencer on climate change ( the Sun). Generally, the mainstream narrative focus is on measuring Carbon dioxide levels trapped in ice cores, ignoring other important empirical data that is mostly ignored in the objective scientific overview such as weather, gas ratios in the atmosphere, volcanic activity, weather balloons, tree rings and seabed cores, which show data going back millions of years, yet you never read about the data from these important climate science sources.
We need to preserve wildlife, the forests and oceans, however, we will look at how this topic is being used by politicians to lie to the people for financial gain and control of people’s freedom and privacy. Most people attribute the climate debate to anthropogenic activity, while this article greatly acknowledges the significant role human actions play in driving ecocide, it also critiques the "wrong kind of green" — misleading or superficial environmental solutions as well as weather manipulation which are also greatly influencing climate, (not in a positive way), as is portrayed by the media or governments. The goal is to restore some balance in the debate, with a fresh approach to understanding the science driving climate change and discrepancies behind dictated government initiatives to mitigate the issues.
Furthermore, it is important to recognize that social engineering has always played a role in shaping societal advancements, often driven by political agendas. These agendas significantly influence both the climate conversation and the solutions presented to the public. By examining these factors in detail, hopefully this article challenges readers to think critically about the broader influences at play in these environmental issues.
Those questioning this narrative are often labeled as "skeptics" or "deniers," yet their critique is rooted in a broader understanding of climate science and environmental science:
Cyclical Climate Patterns: Historical data, including seabed cores, ice cores and geological records, show that the Earth's climate has always fluctuated between cooling and warming phases, influenced by natural cycles like solar activity and Earth's orbital variations.
CO2 and Temperature: Ice core data reveal that temperature rises have historically preceded increases in CO2 levels, challenging the narrative that CO2 is the primary driver of modern warming.
The Role of the Sun and Solar Cycles
The Sun's activity, including solar flares and cyclic variations, significantly affects Earth's climate. Solar cycles like the Schwabe, Jose, Eddy, and Bray-Halstatt cycles, along with Milankovitch cycles, play crucial roles in climate regulation (Solar cycles and why they matter).
The warming caused by the Sun is cyclical, not constant. The Earth's distance from the Sun is always changing due to the irregularity of its orbit and the Sun's own wobble, which is influenced by the combined gravitational pull of all the planets. Consider the various solar cycles: the 11-year Schwabe cycle, the 179-year Jose cycle of Solar Inertial Motion, the 1,000-year Eddy cycle, and the 2,300-2,500 year Bray-Halstatt cycles.
Additionally, consider the three Milankovitch cycles. When examining short to medium-term climate change, Solar Inertial Motion plays a crucial role. The gravitational pull from the combined mass of the planets influences the Sun’s position, causing it to shift in response to the solar system's barycenter. This means the Sun doesn’t remain stationary at the center, but instead follows a wobbling, spiral-like path as it moves. This motion is essential in understanding how the Sun’s varying distance from Earth significantly contributes to medium-term climate fluctuations.
Meanwhile, Solar flares from Coronal Mass Ejections may cause geomagnetic storms and the storm's intensity depends on the size and plume of the CME, which in turn influences radiation and weather on Earth, not many take into account this critical influencer through data looking back in history, the Sun's activity and whether there were surges in CMEs or quite periods is overall ignored in the bigger picture of gathering empirical non-biased data.
The Solar System models we were taught at school were oversimplifications. They created the impression that the Sun is stationary, with consistent activity, and that the planets, including Earth, follow regular, unchanging orbits. However, this is far from the truth. Earth not only tilts and wobbles as it moves around the Sun, but its orbit is also elliptical and constantly shifting, meaning the distance between Earth and the Sun is never constant.
The Milankovitch cycles
This variation is explained by the three Milankovitch cycles. Additionally, the orbits of other planets are also irregular.
The Milankovitch cycles are natural patterns in Earth’s orbit and tilt that affect how much sunlight the planet receives, influencing long-term climate changes, like ice ages. They’re named after Serbian scientist Milutin Milankovitch, who studied these cycles. There are three main parts:
1. Eccentricity (Shape of Earth’s Orbit)
Earth’s orbit changes from being more circular to slightly oval-shaped and back again over about 100,000 years.
When the orbit is more oval, Earth gets more variation in sunlight between seasons.
2. Axial Tilt (Earth’s Tilt Angle)
Earth is tilted on its axis, and this tilt shifts between 22.1° and 24.5° over about 41,000 years.
A greater tilt means stronger seasons (hotter summers, colder winters), while a smaller tilt leads to milder seasons.
3. Precession (Earth’s Wobble)
Earth wobbles like a spinning top, changing the direction the axis points over about 26,000 years.
This affects the timing of seasons in relation to Earth’s orbit.
Why It Matters
These cycles change how sunlight is distributed on Earth, especially at the poles, and can trigger big climate events like the growth or melting of ice sheets. They help explain natural climate changes over tens of thousands of years but don’t account for the rapid warming caused by human activity today.
The Role of Plants
Life adapts much more easily to higher temperatures and increases in CO2, particularly plants, vegetation, trees, plankton, and phytoplankton, than it does to decreases in CO2. As we were taught in biology class, carbon dioxide is plant food, not a pollutant. It promotes the greening of the planet, and the ecological system has a way of offsetting imbalances through its complex cycles as well as storing carbon in tree trunks and beneath the soil of forests. In 2019, remote sensing scientists Chi Chen, Ranga Myneni, and colleagues at Boston University used satellite observations to show that vegetation cover had increased globally by 5 percent since the early 2000s. In 2020, this research group linked the increase in greenness to a slight offset in global temperatures.
In a new study, Chen and his colleagues have explored how this greening could affect land temperatures. Using satellite data and advanced computer models, they found that increased vegetation has a cooling effect, which results from greater efficiency in the vertical movement of heat and water vapor between the land surface and the atmosphere. There are several ways vegetation can influence surface temperatures. For instance, changing leaf area can alter albedo, or the amount of sunlight absorbed or reflected by a landscape. More greenery can also affect land surface resistance, which determines how well water can penetrate and be retained by soil and leaves. Additionally, vegetation can influence emissivity, or how the surface emits or reflects longwave radiation.
However, according to the new study, the most significant cooling effect comes from the reduction in aerodynamic resistance caused by increasing leaf cover. This refers to how features on the ground can either increase or decrease drag and turbulence in the air above. In many environments, extra leaves improve the efficiency of vertical air mixing, allowing more heat and water vapor to rise into the atmosphere. Furthermore, increased leaf cover can boost the amount of water transpired by plants, transferring more moisture into the air, contributing to the hydrogen cycle. This extra moisture can carry away substantial amounts of heat from the ground, leading to cooler surfaces. Chen and his colleagues have found that most vegetated areas on Earth (about 93 percent) experience cooling at the land surface when leaf area increases. Since 2000, at least 30 percent of areas with more leaf coverage have been cooled, while others have grown warmer.
To summarize: increased CO2 levels naturally promote the growth and expansion of vegetation, as CO2 is a crucial nutrient for plants. This process achieves the same outcomes that proponents of geoengineering, such as Bill Gates and some wealthy oligarchs, claim to pursue by spraying large amounts of chemicals and aluminum particles into the atmosphere. These geoengineering efforts risk impacting all life, polluting water, soil, and air, and disrupting ecological cycles. Meanwhile, CIEL published a report in October 2024 that exposed Geoengineering as harmful to biodiversity, terrestrial ecosystems and ocean ecosystems.
The Carbon Credit Conundrum
Carbon credits were introduced as a market-based solution to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, their effectiveness and integrity have been widely debated:
License to Pollute
Rather than reducing emissions, carbon credits often allow companies to offset their pollution, enabling business as usual without genuine environmental benefits.
Corruption and Manipulation
The carbon market is criticized for its lack of transparency and verification, leading to fraudulent schemes that profit from environmental concerns without contributing to real change (Carbon Market Watch).
A Path Toward Social Credit Systems
The implementation of carbon credits could potentially evolve into broader social credit systems:
Behavioural Monitoring
By linking personal and corporate behaviours to environmental metrics, there's a risk of developing socialist systems that monitor and regulate individual choices, similar to China's Social Credit System (Brookings on Social Credit).
Control and Autonomy
In 2012, the Carbon Trust published a white paper detailing a four-week consumer trial in Great Britain, which set a personal carbon allowance of 20 kg CO₂ per day. ‘The trial provided insights into consumer attitudes towards carbon allowances and their potential impact on behaviour.
Government Financial Gain Carbon taxes and carbon trading schemes enrich the wealthy without being reinvested in meaningful environmental efforts. Instead, they funnel profits to the already affluent, further widening economic disparity.
• Repressive Sanctions on Developing Nations: Harsh environmental sanctions placed on developing countries, particularly in Africa, Asia, and India, exacerbate poverty and impede their growth. These restrictions allow Western nations to continue exploiting natural resources like gold, diamonds, and conflict minerals through cheap labour, while the developing world faces unrealistic environmental compliance. Ironically, Western nations, especially the U.S., contribute far more to environmental degradation than these developing countries.
• Unregulated Geoengineering: under the guise of ‘cooling the planet,’ involves releasing untested chemicals and nanoparticles into the environment. This practice pollutes soils, contaminates freshwater, and harms ecosystems, including trees and bees. Despite never undergoing thorough environmental impact assessments on soil, water, or biodiversity, geoengineering continues unchecked. Instead of spending vast sums on these risky experiments, investments could be made in tree planting and other proven, eco-friendly initiatives to mitigate climate change.
• Control of Water Resources: Governments are increasingly tightening their grip on global water reserves, manipulating scarcity to raise prices on this essential human right. The orchestration of water shortages serves to exploit people’s basic need for access to clean water.
• Restricting Personal Freedom: Measures such as carbon taxes, climate credits (resembling the Chinese Social Credit system), and climate-related lockdowns are limiting people’s choices on how they spend money, travel, and consume fuel. Pilot programs testing digital currency (CBDCs) for carbon control are part of a growing trend toward restricted freedom of movement and resource use.
• Technocracy and Surveillance: The Illusion of 'Net Zero'-The concept of achieving 'net zero' emissions is criticized as potentially unattainable without draconian measures, all life forms are carbon-based, net zero means zero life! The rise of AI-driven smart cities and smart grids, smart meters, peak pricing, and electric vehicles is increasing control over people’s daily lives. Higher energy costs, green taxes, and the push for sustainable urban living (e.g., "15-minute cities") come with invasive surveillance through digital IDs, 5G, and monitoring systems like ULEZ (Ultra Low Emission Zones), creating a "Big Brother" society.
• Restrictions on Infrastructure and Industry Travel restrictions: including the closure of airports, and the development of "15-minute cities," are reshaping infrastructure. The emphasis on limiting movement under the banner of sustainability is drastically changing industries, especially in transportation.
• Regulation of Consumption New limitations on consumption: especially through digital currency control (CBDCs) and green taxes, are emerging. These restrictions aim to curb personal production and consumption under the guise of responsible consumption but effectively diminish individual choice and freedom.
• Denmark’s recent implementation of a methane tax on farmers raising cows, has sparked concerns about its potential impact on national food security and the farming sector. The proposed tax is part of Denmark's broader strategy to achieve a 70% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 compared to 1990 levels. Critics argue that such a policy risks undermining local food security and agricultural production, making the country more reliant on imported beef and dairy—an outcome that contradicts National environmental goals by increasing pollutant emissions through transportation. This approach is an oxymoron, as it seeks to address climate issues while potentially creating instability in food security and local economies.
Taking a Look at Further discrepancies:
Economic Disparity
Wealthier nations and corporations can buy their way out of environmental responsibility, while poorer regions suffer under more stringent regulations.
Profit from Air
Financial markets for carbon trading allow banks and investors to profit from environmental concerns, highlighting profit over environmental health.
Scientism vs. Genuine Science
The debate also touches on how science itself is influenced:
Science for Profit
The "Science for Profit Model" examines how and why corporations influence scientific research and its application in policy and practice. This model illustrates strategies employed by industries to maximize the volume, credibility, reach, and utilization of industry-favorable science, while minimizing the dissemination and impact of unfavorable findings. The manipulation of scientific data for policy and profit has been documented, with researchers sometimes tailoring their findings to secure funding or publication The Science for Profit Model, ( Legg, T., Hatchard, J., & Gilmore, 2021 )
Publication Bias
The need to align with editorial biases for career advancement can lead to skewed science to scientism, as noted by researchers like Patrick T. Brown (The Expose News).
Nobel prize-winning scientist Dr. John Clauser says that misguided climate science has "metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience''. In 2023, The Expose News talked with a Climate Scientist who admitted he left out the full truth to get his science paper published in Nature- According to Climate Patrick T. Brown.
His research focuses on producing metrics designed to generate the most attention-grabbing results, tailored to fit the preferences of editors and align with the mainstream narrative, even if it means omitting key truths, according to Patrick T. Brown. He admits that in a paper he co-authored, they didn’t even bother to examine "other obviously relevant factors." “I got published in Nature because I followed a narrative I knew the editors would favour," he confesses, though now he recognizes, "That’s not how science should work."
This situation arises due to the intense competition in his field, leading to papers that are heavily shaped by the biases of the editors who choose which studies to publish from a large pool of submissions.
His career, like many others, depends on his work being widely cited and deemed significant, ensuring funding, recognition, and professional accolades, Brown claims. Why has scientism rather than real genuine science crept into every aspect of our industries and lives? The Science for Profit Model, ( Legg, Hatchard, & Gilmore, 2021), seems to be far more dominant today in both environmental and health sciences industries.
The Science for Profit Model paper was the first to attempt to fully categorise corporate influence on both science and the use of science in policy and practice. It shows that corporate influence on science goes far beyond a handful of industry actors working nefariously to skew isolated evidence bases.
Instead, it involves industries permeating and moulding scientific, academic, and policymaking systems to ensure such systems work in their interest. This is just one example of the lengths that are gone to so the real science becomes a distorted scientism, (not scientific data), that governments regulates and uses for the media. It is manipulated and altered before being presented to the public, the IPCC and United Nations and other institutions are involved in this agenda.
They rely on erroneous climate models based on flawed assumptions instead of empirical data. 'Net Zero', is an impossible task for humans to reach, it would mean imposing tyrannical communist control on humanity with the current energy systems which are the only ones we are allowed to have as demonstrates in my latest book The Silent Ecocide Redux. Keeping humanity in a disparity with cabled electricity but wireless internet? No one questions the obvious disparities, they just accept it as a normal way of life. Zero energy emission free energy devices have been suppressed and taken from inventors to prevent them going on the market to become ubiquitous as the oligarch prefer to protect their power and make money with the current archaic energy systems.
An overview of the discrepancies with current alternative energy
Wind
Wind turbines are essential components of renewable energy infrastructure, they present several environmental and operational challenges. Decommissioned turbines are difficult to dispose of due to the materials used in their construction, and they contain large amounts of oil, up to 1,400 litres per turbine. The turbine blades, often made of composite materials, are not easily recyclable and typically end up being buried in landfills. Additionally, while operational, wind turbines pose a threat to bird populations due to collisions, further complicating their environmental impact. These factors highlight the need for more sustainable solutions in renewable energy infrastructure.
Solar
Solar panels face challenges such as taking up significant space, especially when deployed across large areas of countryside. They are also vulnerable to damage from extreme weather conditions, limiting their effectiveness. While solar energy has great potential, the most efficient deployment methods might include placing panels on roofs of office buildings, along railway tracks, or on roads, rather than sprawling across open land. These alternative placements can reduce environmental impact while still harnessing solar energy for urban areas and infrastructure.
Land grabs for Solar Energy: Land grabs for large-scale solar panel installations have become a growing issue, particularly when vast tracts of farmland or wilderness are replaced with fields of solar arrays. While renewable energy is crucial in diversifying more ecologically friendly energy systems, the displacement of fertile agricultural land or biodiverse habitats for solar farms presents an oxymoron, a new environmental and social challenge. This form of land use can undermine local food security, drive small-scale farmers off their land, while disrupting communities and ecosystems. Moreover, in areas where wild land is converted into solar farms, the loss of natural habitats can have severe consequences for local environment and wildlife, leading to reduced biodiversity, a contradiction in terms of 'environmentally friendly energy systems. The social impact is also significant, as some communities face displacement or are denied access to traditional land uses. To ensure sustainable development, solar energy projects need to prioritize land-use planning that minimizes ecological harm and respects the rights of local communities, instead why not place solar panels on top of parking lots and commercial buildings or along railway tracks and already existing roadways.
In addition to space concerns and vulnerability to extreme weather, solar panels also present issues related to energy storage, efficiency, and resource extraction for manufacturing. The production of solar panels requires significant materials, including rare earth metals, and the disposal of old panels can create environmental waste. While placing panels on rooftops and infrastructure reduces land use, the overall energy production still faces challenges in scale, intermittency, and integration into the grid, making solar energy less reliable without additional support systems.
Natural resources for electric car battery components
Leading scientists set out resource challenge of meeting net zero emissions in the UK by 2050 Europe, US and Great Britain are pushing for electric cars, but do we have the resources for the entire world or even one small island like the UK to completely switch to electric cars? Professor Herrington and his team of the Natural History Museum in London, UK, investigated how many resources were required so this could be fulfilled, what they found was that it would take two times the total annual world cobalt production, nearly the entire world production of neodymium, three quarters of the world’s lithium production and at least half of the world’s copper production, just for the UK to convert to electric vehicles. This means that the UK government’s climate goals are unrealistic and not based on scientific analysis of available resources to reach this goal, despite this their requirement is that all its vehicles be converted to electric by 2050.
The extraction process and environmental impact of lithium for solar and electric car batteries is problematic and far from ecological. For example the hidden environmental and social costs of lithium mining, particularly in South America's "lithium fields." While lithium is essential for the production of electric vehicles and renewable energy storage, its extraction in regions like the Salar de Atacama in Chile has severe ecological impacts, including water depletion and ecosystem disruption. It also highlights the exploitation of local communities, labour abuses, and the broader ethical concerns surrounding the growing demand for this key mineral in the transition to a "green" economy. ( EuroNews)
Nuclear Energy
While the media forces the masses to hyper focus on CO2, ( plant food and an essential gas for all life and ecological cycles), lets take a look at nuclear power which we would need to increase to meet demands of all cars switching to electric by 2030-
The United States, which represents about 4.3% of the world’s population, consumes approximately 30% of global nuclear energy. This results in a significant amount of nuclear waste being produced per capita. Globally, nuclear power plants generate around 8,000 tons of nuclear waste each year. When divided across the global population, this translates to about 1 gram of nuclear waste per person annually, a substantial amount considering that nuclear waste remains hazardous for thousands to millions of years, depending on the isotopes. Currently, there are about 440 nuclear reactors worldwide, each generating roughly 2,000–3,000 tons of nuclear waste annually. This means that, in total, approximately 8,000 tons of nuclear waste is produced globally every year. The construction of each nuclear waste repository can cost up to $20 billion, and the storage and maintenance of nuclear waste continue to be a significant burden. Moreover, there are countless nuclear warheads globally, with trillions spent on maintaining them. Despite these immense costs and risks, why are billions invested in nuclear technology when some alternative energy sources are dismissed by some as impractical or far-fetched?
When you understand the broader picture, you see that those in charge do not really care about the environment, the objectives are political and financial, and for control of humanity.
Meanwhile, the UN, IPCC, and the World Economic Forum at Davos are pushing for trillions in global taxes, claiming it's to save us from a dystopian future caused by human-induced climate change. They go to great lengths to suppress any alternative viewpoints. This is similar to the suppression of free energy concepts; many are unaware that zero-point energy has been achieved multiple times, even by high school age inventors. However, these ground-breaking devices are kept from becoming widespread because they would lead to energy self-sufficiency, eliminating the need for government-controlled energy sources. Moreover, free energy devices produce no pollution, while continuing to allow environmental pollution remains profitable. The core issue isn't just about substituting one energy source for another but about reimagining our entire approach to energy creation, promoting a variety of energy options to prevent the environmental damage that comes from over-reliance on a single source.
Conclusion
The discourse on climate change, while crucial, needs to be critically examined for its political and economic implications. The Climate debate and solutions governments propose such as Carbon credits, might be more about control, profit, and perpetuating existing power structures than about environmental conservation or saving the planet. For genuine environmental progress, we need transparency, equity, and a focus on real solutions that don't compromise human autonomy or environmental integrity.
by
Why Supporting My Work Matters—Wordpress cancelled my news site that published truth and challenged the mainstream narratives, we were there for almost 20 years and had established an 80k readership. My interviews and news explore information that reflects the issues we contend with as humanity stands at a pivotal nexus point. We are venturing into uncharted territory with emerging technologies that bring new challenges and evolving paradigms that push against old beliefs and agendas. In this transformative era, we become the new mapmakers and seed-planters.
1. Bridging Knowledge Gaps-As a neurodivergent female researcher and writer, I bring a unique perspective to challenging mainstream narratives and outdated perceptions. My work in environmental conservation, health freedom, free speech, and learning from the ancients, aiming to fill the gaps in understanding, serving to bridge paradigms and navigate the complexities of a rapidly changing world, I have traveled to the far reaches of the Amazon rainforest with my work to learn from Indigenous voices and lived and travelled in over 15 countries in the last 18 years.
2. Championing Diverse Voices- Firstly, I have always had a unique perspective because of my Aspergers, ADHD, and dyslexia. I persevere despite these neurodivergent challenges. Moreover, being a woman means I have to work much harder to gain any recognition in what I do, I often feel invisible and that my work isn't gaining the momentum it deserves. Women often face additional hurdles in gaining recognition for their work. By supporting my efforts, you’re helping amplify a voice that challenges stereotypes and archetypes, valuing creativity, innovation, and substance over superficial expectations. A woman’s voice is often seen through a clouded lens of societal judgment and archetypes, where others feel compelled to place her in a predefined box—she is typically only validated by her attractiveness or for her academic achievements if she carries titles before or after her name. Otherwise, she has to work much harder to have her voice or work noticed compared to her male peers, as we still live in a patriarchal world, that's why it's valuable for us all to support the work of independent female researchers, writers, journalists, artists, filmmakers, digital media producers.
3. Fearless Exploration- There have been times in the past where I have found myself in some very challenging life-or-death scenarios. That’s why I feel I have nothing to lose anymore and I am wholeheartedly committed to tackling topics that others may shy away from, because they might challenge the mainstream narratives, encouraging critical thinking and fostering meaningful dialogue. Your support enables me to continue my commitment to creating impactful work that inspires and informs.
Thank you
If you gained some knowledge and insights, why not show some appreciation and buy me a Ko Fi
Thank you
Related Links:
Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL). (2021). The risks of geoengineering.
Cornell University. (n.d.). Dairy cattle biologist: Denmark methane tax premature. Cornell Chronicle. Retrieved [Insert Retrieval Date], from https://news.cornell.edu/media-relations/tip-sheets/dairy-cattle-biologist-denmark-methane-tax-premature
Legg, T., Hatchard, J., & Gilmore, A. B. (2021). The Science for Profit Model—How and why corporations influence science and the use of science in policy and practice. PLOS ONE, 16(6), e0253272. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253272
Euronews. (2022, February 1). South America's lithium fields reveal the dark side of our electric future. Euronews.
Evolve to Ecology News, Shaw, C., 2018, A Planet Sized Laboratory- Mass Insect Die Off, Species Extinction, Geoengineering, Mycoplasma, Cancer & Autoimmune diseases
Natural History Museum. (2019, June 5). Leading scientists set out resource challenge of meeting net zero emissions in the UK by 2050. Natural History Museum Press Release.
Shaw, Carlita. The Silent Ecocide Redux 2024
Ice Cores and Climate Data
Graph data from the Vostok Ice Core: Vostok CO2 Data
Graph data from the Vostok temperature: Vostok Temperature Data
Barnola et al. (1991): Tellus
Petit et al. (1999): Nature
Caillon et al. (2003): Science
Mudelsee (2001): Quaternary Science Reviews
Professor John Christy’s Research
Douglass et al. (2007): International Journal of Climatology
Klotzbach et al. (2009): [Journal of Geophysical Research](not available online for this specific submission)
Wines (2014): New York Times
Christy et al. (2006): Journal of Climate
Professor Ian D. Clark’s Research
Clark and Fontes (1990): Quaternary Research
Heinemann (Producer): [Carbon Crooks](not available online for direct link)
Climate Models and Critique
Gregory Young (2009): American Thinker
Political Influence on Environmental Policy
Sierra Club (2014): [Sierra Club Report](not available directly online)
Carbon Trading Corruption
Interpol (2012): [Guide to Environmental Carbon Trading Crime](not available directly online)
The Wrong Kind of Green: Corruption Behind NGOs
Speech by Lumumba Di-Aping
Minutes of the G77 meeting: [The Wrong Kind of Green](not available directly online)
Lumumba’s speech: [YouTube](not available for direct link)
Vostok Ice Core Data
World Data Center for Palaeoclimatology: Vostok Ice Core Data
Geoengineering Trials
Neslen (2017): The Guardian
Geoengineering and Coral Reefs
Martin (2017): The Express
Nanoparticles for Geoengineering
American Elements: American Elements
Insect Decline Study
Hallmann et al. (2017): [NABU](not available directly online)
EPA Description of Sulphur Dioxide
EPA Website: Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) Pollution